Report Takes Wind Out of Inflated Qihoo 奇虎遭遇Citron釜底抽薪

A report from a small research house appears to have finally awakened the world to the reality behind the Chinese Internet comedy known as Qihoo (NYSE: QIHU), which has steadily lured in investors — achieving a ridiculously high valuation — since its IPO in March. The research report by Citron sparked a sell-off in Qihoo shares, which tumbled 10 percent on Tuesday during a turbulent session that saw the broader indexes also fall by more than 2 percent. So, what exactly did Citron say that got everyone so spooked and prompted Qihoo to issue a “clarifying” press release? (Qihoo announcement) I haven’t seen the actual report so can’t comment in too much detail. But based on other media reports and Qihoo’s own announcement, the Citron report essentially called into question many of Qihoo’s claims about the size of its user base and the company’s scale as a major Chinese Internet player. Citron further commented that Qihoo’s stock price should be around $5 per share, or about a quarter of its value of $20 per share at the beginning of the Tuesday New York trading day. (Chinese article) Bloomberg data lists Qihoo’s forward price-to-earnings ratio at a massive 900 times, which seems overstated although I’ve read that its PE is the largest of all China Internet companies. All of this doesn’t surprise me, as I’ve repeatedly questioned Qihoo’s credibility, as the company has been the subject of a number of high profile lawsuits, most of which it has lost, though with little financial consequences. (previous post) I honestly don’t know why investors have been so excited about the stock, and wouldn’t be surprised if this unethical company has engaged in some manipulative activity to get its valuation so high even compared with leaders like Baidu (Nasdaq: BIDU) and Tencent (HKEx: 700). All that said, this new report looks like it may finally awaken investors to all the questions surrounding this company, and could well mark the beginning of a broader decline to Citron’s $5-per-share target or even lower.

Bottom line: A report by a small research house has finally awakened investors to the many questions surrounding Internet firm Qihoo, whose stock could drop steadily for the rest of the year as a result.

Related postings 相关文章:

Qihoo Goes to War With Mobile Browsers 奇虎360加强移动互联网布局

Qihoo Loses Yet Another Lawsuit, But No One Cares 奇虎败诉不足为戒

China Legal System Takes Bite Out of Tencent’s Qihoo Lawsuit 中国法律体系让奇虎在与腾讯的官司中免受重大损失

Qihoo Loses Yet Another Lawsuit, But No One Cares 奇虎败诉不足为戒

China really needs to add some teeth to its legal system for settling corporate disputes, or risk seeing the ecosystem surrounding its most promising private companies degenerate into chaos. My comment comes in response to yet another meaningless judgment against Internet security software maker and troublemaker supreme Qihoo (NYSE: QIHU). In the latest of a series of meaningless judgments against this company, the Chinese courts have fined Qihoo a mere 300,000 yuan, or just $46,000, for its unethical actions that caused a rival product from Kingsoft (HKEx: 3888) to lose 90 percent of its users. (English article; Chinese article) This latest court action follows equally meaningless judgments against Qihoo for similar unethical actions that caused major business disruptions to China’s two biggest net giants, Tencent (HKEx: 700) and Baidu (Nasdaq: BIDU). Investors are clearly getting the message here, that no one needs to fear lawsuits in Chinese courts, with Qihoo shares actually rising 7 percent in New York trading after results of this latest lawsuit were announced. If China doesn’t add some teeth to its legal system soon, it could face the very real danger that others in China’s private sector will begin to engage in similarly unethical behavior to get an edge over their rivals, causing the entire business climate to sink into chaos.

Bottom line: The latest judgment by China’s courts against Qihoo is as toothless as previous ones, boding poorly for the future role of China’s legal system as arbitrator of corporate disputes.

中国应加强解决企业争端的法律体系,否则民营企业生态系统可能恶化,甚至陷入混乱。近日,北京市中级人民法院认定奇虎360<QIHU.N>对金山软件<3888.HK>商品信誉诋毁及卸载等行为构成不正当竞争,判令奇虎停止不正当竞争行为,并赔款30万元。此前奇虎就曾因对百度<BIDU.O>和腾讯<0700.HK>等实施不正当竞争而陆续败诉,但这些判决都没什麽惩戒意义。投资者得到的讯息是:在中国不用怕官司。最新判决结果出来後,奇虎股价甚至还上涨了7%。如果中国不尽快完善法律体系,其他民营企业也会采取类似的不正当竞争行为,导致整个行业陷入混乱。

一句话:法院对奇虎最新判决,跟以前的判决一样没有惩戒意义,法律体系在企业争端解决过程中的作用不容乐观。

Related postings 相关文章:

China Legal System Takes Bite Out of Tencent’s Qihoo Lawsuit 中国法律体系让奇虎在与腾讯的官司中免受重大损失

Qihoo: A Strange Tiger, Indeed 奇虎:真的是头怪虎!

Qihoo: More Controversy from the Year’s Hot-Potato IPO 奇虎再生波澜

China Legal System Takes Bite Out of Tencent’s Qihoo Lawsuit 中国法律体系让奇虎在与腾讯的官司中免受重大损失

UPDATE: Just a day after I wrote this, Chinese media are reporting that Tencent was just awarded a paltry 400,000 yuan in this case. (Chinese article) It seems the Chinese courts are as fast as they are ineffective!

I previously advised investors to avoid the March IPO by security software maker Qihoo 360 (NYSE: QIHU), saying the company and its founder Zhou Hongwei were lightning rods for lawsuits, attracting such unwanted attention from the likes of Tencent (HKEx: 700), Baidu (Nasdaq: BIDU) and Alibaba Group. (previous post) Well, I may have to modify my advice, after seeing Tencent’s recently filed lawsuit stemming from a high profile spat last year in which Qihoo effectively hijacked one of Tencent’s most popular programs. According to Chinese media, Tencent’s recently filed suit is asking for ridiculously small damages of 4 million yuan, or about $600,000, and for a Qihoo apology. (Chinese article) Presumably Tencent is asking for such a paltry amount because that’s the most it believes it can get under China’s impotent legal system. If that’s the case, which it seems to be, then Qihoo may have more to fear from negative publicity than from any real monetary threat even if it loses all the lawsuits against it. Investors seem to realize this too, with Qihoo’s stock jumping 25 percent in just the last two weeks after an initial post-IPO sell-off.

Bottom line: Qihoo remains a dangerous bet due to its reputation for questionable business practices, but faces little monetary danger from lawsuits against it in Chinese courts.

更新:我登了这篇文章后,在过一天中国媒体报道了法院在这个案子上判定奇虎要赔偿腾讯40万元。(中文报道)看来中国法院的速度与他的无效率是差不多的!

我以前建议过投资者回避奇虎360<QIHU.N>在3月份的IPO,因为这家公司和其创始人周鸿祎招惹了腾讯<0700.HK>、百度<BIDU.O>和阿里巴巴等公司,会扯上官司。现在,在看到腾讯近期就去年“3Q大战”提起的诉讼,我可能要修正我的建议。从中国媒体得知,腾讯提出的赔偿数额出奇地少,只有400万人民币,并要求奇虎道歉。腾讯胃口这麽小的原因可能是,他们知道在中国现行的法律体系下,最多只能得到这麽多。如果是这样,那麽即使奇虎输了所有的官司,他们要担心的不过是负面公众形象,并不用太担心金钱损失。投资者可能也意识到了这一点。奇虎仅最近两周股价就已上涨25%。

一句话:考虑到奇虎一直以来与问题经营瓜葛不断的声誉,奇虎依然是比较危险的投资目标,但奇虎在中国的官司不会让其蒙受太多金钱损失。

Related postings 相关文章:

Qihoo: A Strange Tiger, Indeed 奇虎:真的是头怪虎!

Qihoo: More Controversy from the Year’s Hot-Potato IPO 奇虎再生波澜

Qihoo IPO: Security in Lawsuits?

 

 

Qihoo IPO: Security in Lawsuits?

Word has it that Chinese Web security firm Qihoo is gearing up for an IPO, in what could become a major money spinner for its controversial founder and chairman Zhou Hongwei. Details on the offering are still to be determined, but any wise investor would be well advised to read up on Zhou’s long history as a lightning rod for litigation from some of China’s biggest Internet firms. Those who have sued Zhou, who shot to fame as Yahoo’s (Nasdaq: YHOO) initial top man in China, mostly for shady business practices, include Yahoo’s current business partner Alibaba Group, leading search engine Baidu (Nasdaq: BIDU) and most recently China’s top Internet firm Tencent (HKEx: 700), in a high-profile spat has captivate China. Maybe one lawsuit would be understandable, but after a while a pattern starts to develop. No doubt some US investors may pile into this one looking to make a quick buck off one of China’s earliest Internet whizzes. But anyone in for the long haul, or even the medium one, should be extremely wary of this one.

INTERNET: Sogou Chases News, Hollywood Sues Xunlei

Bottom line: Sougou could gain some momentum in the search market this year following some innovative new tie-ups with WeChat, while Xunlei’s stock will remain under pressure as it gets dogged by more piracy issues.

Sogou launches news feature on WeChat

More than a year after emerging as China’s third-largest search engine with the merger of 2 second-tier players, Sogou is finally making an interesting move by launching a news app that takes advantages of its ties to Internet titan Tencent (HKEx: 700). The move looks particularly promising, since the rapid rise of another similar app called Today’s Headlines shows that this is clearly an area with strong demand. The move could pose a serious challenge to the high-flying Today’s Headlines, which earlier this week was named as one of China’s top 10 mobile apps for 2014. (previous post) Read Full Post…

China Supreme Court Clears Tencent Of Monopoly Claims

Supreme Court rules for Tencent in antitrust lawsuit

Big foreign multinationals may be feeling the heat from a recent string of anti-monopoly investigations, but Chinese Internet firms won’t have to face such worries anytime soon. That’s the latest message coming from Beijing, with word that China’s Supreme People’s Court has ruled in favor of social networking giant Tencent (HKEx: 700) in a long-running lawsuit claiming the company controlled a monopoly in the instant messaging market. I originally sided with Tencent when the case was filed 3 years ago by security software specialist Qihoo 360 (NYSE: QIHU), because I felt the lawsuit looked retaliatory for an unrelated suit between the pair at that time. But much has changed since then, most notably the meteoric rise of Tencent’s wildly popular WeChat mobile instant messaging service that has become an indispensable tool for millions of people in China, myself included. Read Full Post…

New Front Opens In Piracy War With Massive Fine

Shenzhen levies massive fine in piracy case

When the history books are written, the month of May 2014 could go down as a watershed in the Chinese battle against piracy. An obscure Shenzhen company could also be part of the story, following reports that the firm Kuaibo Technology has been fined a whopping 260 million yuan ($42 million) by the city government for repeated piracy. Then again, it’s also quite possible and likely that Kuaibo will simply shut its doors to avoid paying the fine, and then re-open nearby using another name and company registration. Read Full Post…

Weibo: TCL, ZTE On Road Trips; Ominous Kudo For Sina Weibo

TCL’s Li, ZTE’s Zeng take to the road

Two of China’s top tech executives were on the road last week, with ZTE (HKEx: 763; Shenzhen: 000063) and TCL (Shenzhen: 000100) officials making overseas visits that could hint at their future directions. Meantime, congratulations were pouring in from around the tech world for Sina (Nasdaq: SINA) on its IPO for (Nasdaq: WB), which struggled to find an audience among big investors but then managed to make a respectable trading debut. Such kudos aren’t unexpected for the popular microblogging platform, often called the Twitter of China. But one particular message from controversial tech titan and Qihoo 360 (NYSE: QIHU) CEO Zhou Hongyi looked just slightly ominous to me, even though the message itself was purely congratulatory. Read Full Post…

Weibo: Tech Execs Trash CCTV Consumer Rights Show

CCTV consumer program shows signs of aging

Where were you this past Saturday night? Most of us probably spent the evening having dinner out, or perhaps visiting friends. But for many of China’s tech executives, the date of March 15 has become for nervousness due to CCTV’s annual investigative reports broadcast that evening for Consumer Rights Day. The program often targets high-profile brands in its effort to uncover abusive business practices, and many of those names come from the tech sector. But this year’s program was a relative disappointment, with some observers cynically noting on their microblogs that CCTV seemed more interested in generating advertising revenue than protecting consumers. Read Full Post…

News Digest: October 18, 2013

The following press releases and media reports about Chinese companies were carried on October 18. To view a full article or story, click on the link next to the headline.
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════

  • Corruption Watchdog Slams Chinese Firms’ Lack Of Transparency (English article)
  • Blackstone Raises Bid For Pactera (Nasdaq: PACT) To $7.30 Per ADS From $7 (PRNewswire)
  • Ex-Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) China Chief Lee Kai-fu Under Propagandist Attack (English article)
  • Geely (HKEx: 175) Announces Relocation Of 2 Car Plants Due To Urban Redevelopment (HKEx announcement)
  • Qihoo 360 (NYSE: QIHU) Sues Baidu (Nasdaq: BIDU) For Unfair Competition (English article)
  • Latest calendar for Q3 earnings reports (Earnings calendar)

Tencent Prevails in Anti-Trust Suit

Judge rejects Qihoo’s lawsuit against Tencent

I’ve often wondered these last few months about what happened to an anti-trust lawsuit filed against Tencent (HKEx: 700) by security software firm Qihoo 360 (NYSE: QIHU) about a year ago. Now I finally have my answer, with word that the Chinese courts have rejected Qihoo’s complaint, meaning that life will now continue as usual for Tencent and other major Chinese Internet firms. (Chinese article) Read Full Post…